Guidelines for the presentations:

WEB presentation:

Oral presentation:


What is he looking for?

You'll note that much of the above asks you to decide what is interesting, structurally. One of the goals of this course is to help you develop insight to make such decisions. So what you choose is an illustration of how much you have learned. Simple observations like "the protein has 362 amino acids" don't reflect much insight. Observations like "the protein forms a ligand binding pocket (Leu63, Ile62, and Pro120) which is hydrophobic around the ligand methyl group, but which has specific (polar) H-bond donors (Gln25 and backbone carbonyl of Ile62) which interact with the matching groups on the ligand and two water-mediated contacts (Arg130 and Asn33) with the ligand phosphate group" illustrate that you can identify biologically important interactions.

It is my intention that this exercise be a very enjoyable learning experience, as well as a chance to show off what you have learned. Get into your structure and have fun!


Plagiarism

It should go without saying, but be careful about unintentional plagiarism. Your presentation should be your work and your words. Also be careful to give attribution (literature citations) wherever appropriate. The introduction should give a link to the PDB entry(s). Additional hyperlinks to Medline entries for citations are particularly apropos. Eric Martz has written a very nice set of guidelines for making CHIME presentations, including discussion of these issues.